FBI – Are They Corrupt? Consider These Facts

The FBI is in the spotlight these days. It is not the first time. J. Edgar Hoover was well known for having a robust operation that not only fought against the criminal eliminate, but was also known to maintain files against politicians that were used for blackmail.

While the days of J. Edgar Hoover are long past several new reports reveal other problems that are just as troubling.

FBI – Andrew McCabe

Approximately three years ago the FBI and Andrew McCabe was being accused of sexual discrimination. The accuser? Special Agent Robyn Gritz.
This according to a report from Circa News:

The FBI launched a criminal probe against former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn two years after the retired Army general roiled the bureau’s leadership by intervening on behalf of a decorated counterterrorism agent who accused now-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other top officials of sexual discrimination, according to documents and interviews.

This report leads one to believe that the Flynn investigation was a twofer. The deep state hates President Trump, and the FBI did not like the fact that Flynn spoke up for Agent Robyn Gritz.

The Circa report continues: “Three FBI employees told Circa they personally witnessed McCabe make disparaging remarks about Flynn before and during the time the retired Army general emerged as a figure in the Russia case.”

MaCabe did get his revenge with the leak of Flynn’s private conversation in violation of the constitution.

If you read the entire Circa report, you cannot come to any reasonable conclusion other than that this situation must be independently investigated.

In addition, MaCabe is also under investigation for being in violation of the Hatch Act. This having to do with his actions in his wife’s campaign and political activities. The campaign that netted her over $670,000 of cold hard cash.

Just The Tip

However, MaCabe is just the tip of the corruption. In his recent testimony, James Comey revealed that then Attorney General Loretta Lynch told him to alter his statement about the Hillary Clinton email criminal investigation. He was instructed to use the same wording as the Clinton campaign. He complied.

This in addition to the FBI director overreaching his authority in making a determination that Clinton would not be prosecuted.

While the Justice Department may or may not have violated the law by not prosecuting Clinton they were never given the chance. The FBI director did violate the law with his actions though. That is a fact.

Not only did the FBI violate the law by making that decision, they also let Clinton’s assistant off the hook for mishandling classified material.

They gave immunity deals that produce no convictions, rather just let more people off the hook of criminal activity. It was a classic case of a cover-up.

FBI – The Lawsuit

Besides all of this, we now learn that the FBI was given an immense amount of evidence of governmental wrongdoing that they buried.

Governmental wrongdoing involving unconstitutional surveillance. Just the kind of surveillance that President Trump called them out for regarding their surveillance of him.

The whistleblower who turned over this evidence is now suing them. The lawsuit alleges that the FBI and James Comey covered up the information. That they are in fact co-conspirators in the illegal activities.

This is just the information that we know. Most likely it is the tip of the iceberg.

The FBI, the Nations’s top law enforcement agency seems to also be one of the nation’s top criminal enterprises. Not in regards to most of the men and women in the field. Most agents are probably honorable, patriotic Americans.

When you look though, at the management’s actions and decisions, it is hard to say that they as an organization are not corrupt.


James Comey – Admitted Being One Of The Leakers

James Comey revealed a lot in his testimony on Thursday. Much of is not being reported by the Corporate Mainstream Media Complex correctly.

One of the biggest being that James Comey who has said that the leaking of government secrets is a problem that must be corrected, is that he, is in fact, one of the leakers.

His reason was two-fold. One because he was offended that the President said he did not do a good job. And that the President stated that he was not able to adequately lead the FBI.

And two because he was attempting to manipulate the political process and force the appointment of a special counsel.

Both reasons being completely self-serving and have nothing to do with his job as the former head of the FBI. And both reasons are right from Comey’s testimony. No need to speculate. It was his testimony.

Should the FBI director be involved in such political gamesmanship? Moreover, why was he?

If it was not pure politics in the case of Trump, why did Comey go along with misleading Congress at the request of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch? That was his testimony too.

Also, why did not that interaction create the need for Comey to make notes of those meetings?

Will Special Counsel Robert Muller make his decisions based on politics like James Comey?

These are questions that are on the minds of a lot of Americans.

While Comey said, he was worried about the reputation of the FBI his actions do nothing but raise doubts. While also raising legitimate suspicions that the FBI is not executing the law justly.

James Comey Confirms Trump’s Innocence

The other thing that Mr. Comey clarified is that the President was never under investigation.

That all the news reports we have heard from the media have been indeed Fake News. It was not true. The media was wrong.

The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC along with countless other news outlets have been reporting a lie. Continue reading “James Comey – Admitted Being One Of The Leakers”

Seth Rich Murder – Is The FBI Part Of The Cover-Up?

Recent revelations in regards to the Seth Rich murder has opened up some troubling concerns. Is the FBI part of the cover-up?

The troubling revelations touch many aspects of the as yet unsolved murder.

Well known investigator Rod Wheeler who was hired by the family to look into the incident has confirmed through two separate direct sources that the FBI has told the DC police to stand down and not investigate the murder.

(Update) After intense pressure, Mr. Wheeler has since wavered from his original statement.

In addition, a federal source who spoke on the condition of anonymity has said that the FBI has done a forensic analysis on Mr. Rich’s computer and that there were thousands of emails sent to Wikileaks with the vast majority having attachments sent with them.


Wikileaks while not ever divulging their sources has offered reward money for any tips leading to the solving of the Seth Rich murder, along with their stating that Russia was not the source.

In the eleven years of their existence, Wikileaks has not put out information that has been proven to be incorrect. They emphatically say that the DNC information did not come from a state actor.

While the FBI has claimed that the DNC “Hack” was attributed to Russia, the FBI never examined the DNC’s computers. The DNC refused to give them access.

When Mr. Wheeler first contacted the DC police to begin his inquiry, the police did not respond but rather notified the DNC. A DNC staffer then contacted the family to inquire why they hired a detective to look into the case.

It is looking more and more that Seith Rich was the Wikileaks source.

There have always been suspicions that have surrounded the Clinton’s due to a string of mysterious deaths that have occurred to people involved with them.

Even though this murder involves the DNC, the main storyline around the leaked emails was the Clinton and the DNC collusion to make sure Senator Sanders did not win the nomination.

Did The FBI Examine Seth Rich’s Computer?

If the FBI did, in fact, examine the Rich computer, why would they insist that Russa had anything to do with what was not a “Hack” but a whistleblower who has upset over the DNC’s tampering with the electoral process?

Perhaps competent politically neutral leadership at the FBI can clear up these glaring ambiguities and put Americans minds at rest that the FBI is not involved in this cover-up.